Two of my books have looked at how entrepreneurship can help improve K-12 education. In a new paper titled “Why is Educational Entrepreneurship so Difficult? 2006,” Henry M. Levin looks at barriers to badly needed innovation in how we approach education.
Much of the recent literature on improving education in the United States seeks to promote entrepreneurship as the solution to raising educational quality and equity. But, the historical record documenting substantial and sustained departure from conventional educational practices is scant despite numerous attempts at entrepreneurial innovation. This paper contends that the challenge of entrepreneurially induced change is not due to a deficit of ideas or lack of volition on the part of those who seek change. Rather it is due to intrinsic features of the educational system which defy modification. These include not only such matters as a stubborn school culture, but also the very role of schools as organizations that must serve other organizations and depend upon them for resources. The paper evaluates the record of new forms of organization such as charter schools and educational management organizations as well as other well-intentioned strategies for transforming American education. It concludes that successful educational entrepreneurship must overcome a deeply-rooted institutional conservatism that is largely explained by modern institutional theory.
We see this here in Tennessee. When we moved here, I had hoped that I could continue to support charter schools as a means to raise the bar for all schools in terms of increased financial and outcomes accountability. Alas, the public school lobby in this state has made sure that the charter school law makes any attempt at setting up a charter school doomed to fail from the very beginning. When I gave a talk to leaders of our public schools, it fell on deaf ears.
Thanks to Paras Dagli for passing this along.