Smallness Offers Advantages: Don’t Rush being a Big Business

Something that always gives me pause is when I hear entrepreneurs and their managers refer to their small business as “the company”, or even worse, “the corporation.”

I was talking with an entrepreneur who has two partners and no employees.  Their business seemed to be kind of “stuck.”  They were not getting some important, and yet basic things done to market their business and take better care of their customers.  He kept saying things like “the corporation needs to do this” and “the corporation should do that.”  They were spending most of their time trying to determine who should have what title and how to create a well-defined structure.

I finally said, “Wait a minute!  There are just three of you!  Sit down, make a list of what needs to get done, and divide up the work.  You are ‘the corporation’ so get busy!”

In fairness, the entrepreneur and his partners have big dreams and have a business model that could become a big business someday.  But they will never reach their dreams if they don’t start running their small business the way it needs to be run.

A key advantage that small businesses have is that they are not big businesses.

Small businesses can be nimble and can react quickly to customer needs and changes in the market.  Small businesses can continue to be entrepreneurial and seek opportunity.

As the business grows you will need to add some structure, increase the clarity of people’s roles, and put in some processes and procedures.  But all of this should be done judiciously and slowly.

Small businesses that try to act “big” too quickly run the risk of losing their entrepreneurial culture.  I can tell you from my own experience that once you lose the entrepreneurial spirit in a business, it is very difficult, if not impossible to get it back.

So how do you start to build an organization while still keeping an entrepreneurial culture?

When you delegate, make sure that you don’t just delegate tasks.  You need to delegate the responsibility and the authority to manage the tasks.  Give your employees the ability to make improvements and to react quickly to the market.  Everyone needs to have a sense of “ownership” of what they do.

When you start to create organizational structure for your business, don’t just create positions and reporting relationships to deal with immediate problems and challenges.  Be intentional about the kind of structure you are building and how it will impact your ability to remain entrepreneurial as a business.  Too much bureaucracy can kill innovation very quickly.

When you start to create processes and procedures ask yourself one question:  Is it critical?  While standardized processes and procedures are important to support a growing business, if overdone they can actually inhibit your ability to grow.

When you own a small business don’t be in such a rush act like a “big” business.  Your smallness is part of your competitive advantage.  Find the balance between building an organization and maintaining your entrepreneurial culture.

 

Muddled Structure can Block Growth

The organizational structure of the typical small business evolves from a series of specific decisions to help manage the challenges presented by growth.

When there becomes too much else to do, the entrepreneur finally decides to stop doing the books and hires a bookkeeper.

As demand increases and more sales opportunities arise, a salesperson is hired to help. When more and more workers get hired, a supervisor is named to manage day-to-day operations. And when a new location is opened, a manager is brought in to help run it.

With each of these decisions the entrepreneur starts to create an organizational structure.

As the business grows, employees are organized into specific functions such as bookkeeping, sales and operations, and eventually someone is put in charge of each of these departments.

While the decisions an entrepreneur makes to handle each specific challenge may make good sense individually, sometimes it doesn’t add up to a complete whole after the structure has been pieced together.

To be effective, the organization’s structure needs to align with the overall market strategy that the business is pursuing.

In their classic book, The Discipline of Market Leaders, Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema identify the three common competitive strategies of successful businesses. They conclude that there is a specific alignment of structure, culture and systems necessary to support the chosen strategy.

The first competitive strategy is operational excellence. This is what a business needs to be efficient, consistent and low-cost.   Burger chain McDonald’s is a good example of this strategy, as its customers want the same food served quickly and inexpensively in every McDonald’s they visit. This strategy works best with what might be called a bureaucratic structure, where decision-making is completely centralized at the top levels of the business with tight controls to ensure consistent performance.

The second strategy is product leadership, in which the business seeks to be the leading innovator in its market. This is a common strategy of many technology businesses. The structure that works best with this strategy is one that is flexible and can quickly adapt to each new product offering.  People are reassigned and reorganized to meet the unique needs of each new product.

The third strategy is customer intimacy. This strategy — as it evolves — must allow any employee to do what needs to be done to meet the needs of the customer.   A common mistake of small businesses is that, as they grow, they try to pursue all of these strategies at once. This is never sustainable over the long run.

Each strategy demands a specific approach to organizing how work gets done.

A key to being a successful venture and managing growth is finding the competitive strategy that works best for the market, and then working to build a structure over time that supports that strategy.

There is no one best structure for all businesses. But there is a best structure for the type of market strategy that a business chooses to pursue. Find it.

Working On the Business Easier Said Than Done

Entrepreneurs face a difficult challenge in how they should be spending their time as a business grows.

 

The dilemma is commonly referred to as needing to “work on the business rather than work in it.”

 

Typically, entrepreneurs are heavily involved in working directly with their customers during the startup phase. They do much of the work necessary to generate revenues. Tasks such as sending out invoices, bookkeeping and developing marketing materials are squeezed into their days as they can find time.

 

And if there’s no time during the day, these things may get put off until the end of the day or the weekend.

 

But with growth comes the need to add more employees, and with a growing staff comes the need to develop procedures and systems to make sure that all the necessary work of the business gets accomplished.

 

This is when entrepreneurs’ own job description needs to begin to change, as it is up to them to “work on the business” and make sure it evolves and develops.

Easier said than done

 

However, for many entrepreneurs this transition in roles is much easier said than done.

 

Often it’s the “in the business” work that led someone to start the business in the first place. The owner may have started a cabinet company because he loves working with wood. Or someone may have started a Web development company because of her design skills and knack on the computer.

 

It can be hard to let go of work you really enjoy doing.

 

Another issue that can get in the way of this transition for the entrepreneur is being uneasy with delegating important tasks to others. Developing good training programs, clear procedures and effective systems can help make that process a successful one.

 

I hear from many entrepreneurs that the process of moving from a hands-on role to more of a management role can create anxiety. They tell me that they feel they’re not busy enough. Or they say that they feel as if they’re not really contributing.

 

From my own experience, I can say that these feelings will ease over time as the business grows and the entrepreneur becomes more comfortable in his new role.

 

Some entrepreneurs are not sure what success looks like when working “on the business.” They are more accustomed to checking things off the to-do list by working with customers and doing more routine work.

 

But creating effective systems and building a strong culture will become a bigger part of the entrepreneur’s job. Any outcomes from these tasks will evolve slowly. Therefore, it will take a long time to see the results of these efforts.

 

It’s best to view the transition of the entrepreneur’s role in the company as a one- to two-year project. As you begin to delegate parts of what you do, replace them with things that will improve the business and help it grow.

 

Moving from working in the business to working on the business is best accomplished if it’s viewed as a gradual process rather than an abrupt event.

A Culture for Success

One of the greatest challenges faced by growing businesses is to avoid the pitfalls of culture drift. 

Most entrepreneurs launch their businesses with the intention of building a certain type of culture.  But, the demands of growth can take the entrepreneur’s eye off creating an intentional culture.  And each new hire can bring in elements from the different cultures where they have worked.  The result is that over time the culture can look very different from what the entrepreneur had originally intended.

My friend John Wark has passed along an interesting article from Inc.com about an entrepreneur named Nick Sarillo who founded Nick’s Pizza and Pub.  Sarillo’s story offers lessons on how to create an intentional culture during times of growth:

Sarillo has built his company’s culture by using a form of management best characterized as “trust and track.” It involves educating employees about what it takes for the company to be successful, then trusting them to act accordingly. The alternative is command and control, wherein success is the boss’s responsibility and employees do what the boss says. Think of the Navy SEALs versus the National Guard. Both approaches can work, but they produce very different cultures. If done right, moreover, trust and track can allow a company to be nimble, flexible, and productive enough to perform at the highest level through good economies and bad.

Another Entrepreneurial Myth Busted

There is another entrepreneurial myth that needs busting.  It is this one:

“Entrepreneurs are good at starting things, but cannot manage them once they begin to grow.”

I have been arguing that the problem is that we don’t consistently teach entrepreneurs how to manage growth.  My experience has been that once we do, their success improves considerably.  Most have never run a growing, successful business before.  They just need the knowledge and tools.  I have done this type of training with both our students and entrepreneurs in the community ever since I got back into teaching.

Now their is some empirical evidence that entrepreneurs ain’t so shabby when it comes to managing larger, successful businesses.

New research from Babson College by Prof. Joel Shulman finds that publicly traded stocks led by entrepreneurs, consistently outperform non-entrepreneurs by a wide margin. Stocks of entrepreneur-led companies significantly outperform non entrepreneurs.

Shulman suggests that because entrepreneurs try to keep costs low while vigorously growing the business — you just got to love that Bootstrapping spirit — entrepreneurial companies are well positioned to perform better than ever in a sluggish, recovering economy.

Shulman’s recent update on stocks for calendar 2009, show:

  • Stocks of entrepreneur-led companies significantly outperform non entrepreneurs (YTD through 12/1/09,  650+ global entrepreneurs are up 93%).
  • Stocks of “bureaucrat” companies underperform non-bureaucrats and entrepreneurs by a wide margin (these are stocks that individuals would sell or sell short).
  • Stocks of Entrepreneur-led companies continue to outperform non-entrepreneurs even after adjusting by market cap size, sector, geography, or time period.

Culture and Labs

jazzmyn.jpg

This past Friday I led a seminar for our local chapter of EO called “An Intentional Culture.”

Whenever I talk about culture I always am reminded of a chocolate Labrador retriever we used to have named Jazzmyn.  While she was one of the sweetest dogs we have ever owned, anyone who has had a lab will tell you that they are a very high maintenance dog. 

Training is a life-long process with many labs.  If you ever let up, they will begin to go their own way — labs have a strong will and a mind of their own!

That is why Labrador retrievers are the best metaphor I can think of for the culture within a business.  Culture also can seem like it has a mind of its own.  Your culture will be shaped by everyone you hire, your market, your customers, and even investors. 

If you don’t continue to pay very close attention to your culture, it will begin to drift away from what you had intended.  Just like our old lab Jazzmyn, you can never take your eye off your culture.

Some entrepreneurs are driven by the desire to create a certain type of culture in the business.  For example, Nashville businesses like Emma (e-mail marketing) and redpepper (advertising and strategic marketing agency) consider building and sustaining their cultures to be one of their top priorities.  To make that happen, the founders and their team relentlessly work to build and sustain their cultures.

Building a Bootstrap Culture

My column this week in the Tennessean explores how to build a bootstrap culture:

When starting a new business, most entrepreneurs have to bootstrap their business — that is, find ways to get things done with limited resources.

But why do so many owners keep bootstrapping even when the cash starts flowing and they no longer have to bootstrap out of necessity?

Bootstrapping over the long term helps keep the business efficient, which reduces the need to secure external financing. This allows the entrepreneur to keep ownership of the business, reduces the need for taking on debt and helps strengthen the business during recession.

In addition, continuing to bootstrap helps build a stronger cash flow. And the stronger the cash flow, the higher the value of a private business. Bootstrapping, therefore, helps build wealth for the entrepreneur by increasing the value of the venture as it grows.

An entrepreneur has to get everyone in the organization to become a bootstrapper. This requires the creation of a bootstrapping culture throughout the company. Entrepreneurs should communicate a consistent message about bootstrapping. Highlight its importance in every form of communication, ranging from informal conversations with employees to formal communications such as newsletters, annual reports and policy manuals.

A consistent message reinforces the importance of bootstrapping behavior.

For example, include a feature in every company newsletter about an employee who was the “bootstrapper of the month,” offering a story of how he or she accomplished a task with minimal resources. Remember, storytelling is a fundamental part of building a culture in a business.

However, remember that your actions need to reinforce your message about bootstrapping. The leaders of a business should bootstrap at every opportunity to serve as a role model and demonstrate their commitment to bootstrapping.

Building a bootstrapping culture also requires careful recruiting of new employees. When bringing new people into the business, look beyond their technical skills and experience to fill the position. So, if you want a bootstrapping culture to flourish, find out if prospective employees fit into a bootstrapping way of doing business.

Ask the right questions

One approach to evaluating the fit of prospective employees is to develop open-ended interview questions that assess their bootstrapping temperament. For example, you can ask all the applicants the following: “Tell me about a time when you had to accomplish a task when limited resources were available.”

If the interviewee answers by saying that she always had more than enough budgetary support in her old job, it might be difficult for her to adapt to a bootstrapping environment. Or, if she answers by complaining about the lack of resources in her old job, or about how her old boss was always a cheapskate, it’s a sure sign that this person will not have bootstrapping in her blood.

On the other hand, if she speaks with enthusiasm and pride about how she got the job done within the limited resources available, the candidate is a perfect fit.

To keep bootstrapping alive as a company grows, entrepreneurs must create a culture in which bootstrapping is simply “how we do business around here.”

When is it Time to Get That Next Puppy?

Thanks to all of you who e-mailed me about my post yesterday on focus versus diversification.  Several folks asked me when diversification does make sense for smaller businesses.

If the core business you have going is stable and mature, it can be a time to consider spreading your wings into new deals.  It is not always a wise thing to do, but this is the point when shifting your attention to something new makes the most sense.

If you do branch out into new deals, the best approach is to think incremental.  Choose deals that build off of what you know and what you are already doing.

However, remember that your ability to spot a good deal and even to execute the start-up has very little to do with your ability to manage an increasingly complex set of operations.  That is what too many people fail to realize.

Starting yet another deal is like getting a new puppy when you already have a dog.  (I am sitting on the back porch this morning with our two dogs AND our daughter and son-in-law’s two dogs, one of which is a lab puppy — so I guess we know where this metaphor is coming from). 

Your old dog has kind of gotten on cruise control in the family.  He is just kind of there — a great pal, but not much fun and excitement any more.

The thought of a new puppy is exciting.  After all, it will good for your older dog to get a playmate.  And what fun a new puppy is to have around the house.  We do like to rationalize, now don’t we?

So you buy that new puppy.  Now you have to deal with all of the challenges of a puppy in the house that you kind of glossed over or shoved into the back of your mind when considering this decision — the messes, the chewed up shoes and furniture, the middle of night trips into the yard.

On top of that, now your older dog is getting kind of put out.  He needs more attention than he did when he had the house to himself.  He starts to act up — maybe forgets his house breaking manners or starts to misbehave in other ways just like that new puppy.  So now you are dealing with the demands of the puppy and the renewed demands your older dog has now created for you!

I have to be honest with you at this point.  We have gotten that second dog several times in our lives.  And I have
started that next deal several times.  But, every time it has ended up being
more work and more stress than I had planned for.

I don’t tell you all of this to say never start a second or third or fourth deal while still operating your first deal. 

I say this to make sure that you remember that just because you can start another business does not always mean you should.